Argue to agree: A case-based argumentation approach
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Argumentation Tool that Enables Agents to Argue
Multi-Agent Systems are suitable to provide a framework that allows to perform collaborative processes in distributed environments. Furthermore, argumentation is a natural way of reaching agreements between several parties. We propose an infrastructure to develop and execute argumentative agents in an open MAS. It offers the tools to develop agents with argumentation capabilities. It also offer...
متن کاملWhy argue? Towards a cost-benefit analysis of argumentation
This article proposes a cost–benefit analysis of argumentation, with the aim of highlighting the strategic considerations that govern the agent’s decision to argue or not. In spite of its paramount importance, the topic of argumentative decision-making has not received substantial attention in argumentation theories so far. We offer an explanation for this lack of consideration and propose a tr...
متن کاملArgue tuProlog: A Lightweight Argumentation Engine for Agent Applications
Argumentation is becoming increasingly important in the design and implementation of autonomous software agents. We believe that agents engaged in decision-making and reasoning should have access to a general purpose argumentation engine that can be configured to conform to one of a range of semantics. In this paper we discuss our current work on a prototype light-weight Java-based argumentatio...
متن کاملCharacterizing defeat graphs where argumentation semantics agree
In the context of Dung’s theory of argumentation frameworks, comparisons between argumentation semantics are often focused on the different behavior they show in some (more or less peculiar) cases. It is also interesting however to characterize situations where (under some reasonably general assumptions) different semantics behave exactly in the same way. Focusing on the general family of SCC-r...
متن کاملAn Argumentation Based Approach to Risk Assessment
Reliable quantitative risk assessment requires the use of meaningful statistical data and well validated models for their interpretation. In certain domains neither the data nor the validated models are available. Nevertheless, there may still be a requirement to generate a meaningful characterisation of risk, presented in a form which reflects the reliability and accuracy of the data available...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: International Journal of Approximate Reasoning
سال: 2013
ISSN: 0888-613X
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijar.2012.06.005